October 13, 2009 The Letter and the Parcel and the Eternity of the Postman’s Job
There are forms of work which are unamenable to technological change. The question of technology replacing labour is an ongoing story in the study of work (see Braverman on deskilling, or Sennett on the loss of craft skills). Some accounts of service work suggest that these are the least ‘vulnerable’ to replacement, although researchers at Saitama University is developing robots to provide elder care (Kobayashi et al, 2009). Against this tale of decline and alienation might be a story which celebrates technological replacement of manual effort. The washing machine and the vacuum, for example, may produce More Work for Mother (Schwartz Cowan, 1989), but they do save me the drudgery of dolly tub and posser that my Grandma dealt with, to my intense pleasure. This entry is on a theme of unreplaceable labour, and I refer to the postman.

photography by Lynne Pettinger
The idea of post — something that comes directly to your doormat for 39p that someone else pays — is pretty amazing. We used to get milk and eggs on the doorstep, maybe dusters and cleaning equipment courtesy of the travelling salesman. Now though, its only the post that arrives like this. It is a daily triumph that the post comes to me direct (even as I get mostly bills, marketing and letters to families who have long since moved out of my house).
The postman’s job is unreplaceable, but it is affected by technologies. The bicycle and the delivery van; the rubber band, the sack and the street storage boxes; the uniform and the letter box in my front door are all parts of this. And that is without thinking about the technologies of collection, sorting and movement. The fundamental job of the postman, though, is to move from door to door, up my street and down yours. It requires body work and an engagement with the material cultures of people’s homes and their private and public messages. There is no way of not having a postman if the post is to be delivered. So thank you postman. I think you have a romantic job.
Though booming internet shopping might keep some postmen in work, even as Royal Mail loses the contract to deliver Amazon parcels, his job isn’t quite as romantic as once it was. Gone are the days of daily letters or postcards, and even bills are now delivered online. That seems like a loss to me, I like getting and sending postcards. So please send me a letter. Send me the pillow you dream on. Send in the clowns. Send me birthday cards, sympathy cars, a postcard from your holiday and a thank you for dinner. Let the postman make me happy.
References
- Braverman, H. (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital; the Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York, Monthly Review Press.
- Kobayashi, Y., Kuno, Y., Niwa, H., Akiya, N., Okada, M. Yamazaki, K. and Yamazaki, A. (2009) ‘Assisted-Care Robot Initiation of Communication in Multiparty Settings’. Chi 2009 conference, Boston MA.
- Schwartz Cowan, R. (1989) More Work for Mother: the Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. London: Free Association.
- Sennett, R. (2008) The Craftsman. London : Allen Lane.
Comments
beautiful! and Soooo timely
See also Ellis, R. M. and Haywood, A. J., (2006) The implications of eBay for ‘real networks’: the distribution of goods, money flows and the Internet infrastructure of e-commerce. Chimera Working Paper 2006-08. Ipswich: University of Essex
http://www.essex.ac.uk/chimera/content/pubs/wps/CWP-2006–08%20Implications%20of%20eBay%20for%20Real%20Networks.pdf
At 9:09 am on October 16, 2009 Ben Anderson said:
There’s a great London Review of Books piece on this too: http://www.lrb.co.uk/v31/n18/maya01_.html
At 2:36 pm on October 23, 2009 Ben Anderson said:
[…] is that technological change will replace human labour in manufacture and services (see the Saitama robots providing elder care). And certainly one of the obvious predictions to make is that technology replaces paid […]
At 3:37 pm on October 30, 2009 future work and the exchange of a heartbeat : No Way To Make A Living said: